Current:Home > StocksFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Wealth Evolution Experts
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Surpassing Quant Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-06 19:30:41
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (33186)
Related
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Miami (Ohio) coach Chuck Martin says Alabama ‘stole’ kicker Graham Nicholson
- A 2nd ex-Memphis officer accused in the fatal beating of Tyre Nichols is changing his plea
- 'Prehistoric' relative of sharks struggle to make a comeback near Florida
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Taylor Swift breaks silence on 'devastating' alleged Vienna terrorist plot
- AP Week in Pictures: Global
- US Open 2024: Schedule, prize money, how to watch year's final tennis major
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- At DNC, Gabrielle Giffords joins survivors of gun violence and families of those killed in shootings
Ranking
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Trump's campaign removes 'Freedom' video after reports Beyoncé sent cease and desist
- 4 former Milwaukee hotel workers plead not guilty to murder in D’Vontaye Mitchell's death
- Viral video captures bottlenose dolphins rocketing high through the air: Watch
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Delaware State travel issues, explained: What to know about situation, game and more
- BMW recalls over 720,000 vehicles due to water pump malfunction that may cause a fire
- US Open 2024: Schedule, prize money, how to watch year's final tennis major
Recommendation
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
RFK Jr. questioned in NY court over signature collectors who concealed his name on petitions
AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Oklahoma’s state primary runoff elections
TikTok’s “Dancing Engineer” Dead at 34 After Contracting Dengue Fever
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
Only Murders in the Building's Steve Martin Shares How Selena Gomez Has Grown Over the Past 4 Years
Scientists closely watching these 3 disastrous climate change scenarios
Jolly Rancher flavored popsicles recalled over concerns of milk contamination